Re: Procedures versus the "fastpath" API

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Procedures versus the "fastpath" API
Date: 2021-04-30 18:04:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmoacTy7MZp4BfeVU+eHk_pbMZn9tkVjH9cxY7cdga=Suhw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> By my count, we have three votes for forbidding procedure calls via
> fastpath in all branches (me, Joe, Michael), and two for doing
> something laxer (Noah, Laurenz). The former is surely the safer
> choice, so I'm going to go do that.

FWIW, I'm also for the stricter approach.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-04-30 18:04:51 Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-04-30 17:56:08 Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs