Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Date: 2021-12-13 17:33:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaaxksLCUL-Z=SBw+XB=g_zTitfshT7tF5rhuPoMeYTeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:23 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I've done as much as I plan to do in that direction. As of the
> respective branch tips, I see clean builds and check-world
> results with minimal configure options in all branches back to 9.2
> on Fedora 35 (gcc 11.2.1) and macOS Monterey (Apple clang 13.0.0).

I think this is great. Thanks for being willing to work on it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-12-13 17:44:11 Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Previous Message Blake, Geoff 2021-12-13 17:27:00 Re: Add spin_delay() implementation for Arm in s_lock.h