Re: Post-CVE Wishlist

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Post-CVE Wishlist
Date: 2021-11-24 20:19:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaauW4abqkZ-zbmMu+3ALjjUcb0uYQmwV43nb7ZMRsFKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 3:14 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> One other point to be made here is that it seems like a stretch to call
> >> these particular bugs "high-severity".
>
> > Well, I was referring to the CVSS score, which was in the "high" range.
>
> The server CVE is; the client CVE, not so much, precisely because we
> couldn't find exciting exploits.

Right, I understand that.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2021-11-24 20:28:29 internal subtransactions, memory contexts, resource owners
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-24 20:14:03 Re: Post-CVE Wishlist