Re: Further simplification of c.h's #include section

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Further simplification of c.h's #include section
Date: 2017-11-16 02:12:05
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa_y3OWg57WATYevPuQbiUustquVn6Hj08W+KoUShLRkw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thoughts?

Sure, having a win32_port.h as a sub-include of port.h seems fine.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-11-16 02:21:05 Re: [HACKERS] moving some partitioning code to executor
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-11-16 01:57:43 Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.