Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f"
Date: 2012-08-08 20:55:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaYzAbrObqd9x7LfudC=3mo8tB6j_5qheSe0U6LQqjjfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> Dear PostgreSQL developers,
>
> Plese find attached a patch so that:
>
> Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f"
>
> Make psql --single-transaction option work on a non-interactive
> standard input as well, so that "psql -1 < input.sql" behaves as
> "psql -1 -f input.sql".
>
> This saner/less error-prone behavior was discussed in this thread back in
> June:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg00785.php
>
> I have tested it manually and it works for me. I'm not sure this is the best
> possible implementation, but it is a small diff one. I haven't found a place
> in the regression tests where "psql" could be tested with different options.
> Did I miss something?

I'm wondering if perhaps -- in addition to what you've done here -- we
should make "psql -1" error out if reading from a terminal.

Because accepting options that are intended to cause important
behavior changes and then ignoring those options is Bad.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-08 21:15:38 Re: -Wformat-zero-length
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-08-08 20:44:52 Re: Statistics and selectivity estimation for ranges