From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Васильев Дмитрий <d(dot)vasilyev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 |
Date: | 2016-02-11 18:09:27 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaYuAbFviV2CvFkct9k3wGR+cVdyOMUnS=c=ZPG0aDD7w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> One problem is that it makes for misleading results if you try to
>> benchmark 9.5 against 9.6.
>
> You need a really beefy box to show the problem. On a large/new 2 socket
> machine the performance regression in in the 1-3% range for a pgbench of
> SELECT 1. So it's not like it's immediately showing up for everyone.
>
> Putting it on the open items list sounds good to me.
Well, OK, I've done that then. I don't really agree that it's not a
problem; the OP said he saw a 3x regression, and some of my colleagues
doing benchmarking are complaining about this commit, too. It doesn't
seem like much of a stretch to think that it might be affecting other
people as well.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-11 18:13:27 | Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-11 18:06:14 | Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean |