Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only
Date: 2025-05-19 14:39:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaYAXwBXg+0VLWe9m4P_fiZ1yLzoq3vhPG_XzMxHj+YRg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 10:35 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I proposed a possible way to test for this at [1]. I was intending to
> get around to that sooner or later, but the urgency of the matter just
> went up in my eyes...

Ah, right, I actually read that thread but had forgotten about it. I
don't know if that idea will work out but it certainly seems like a
good thing to try.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-05-19 14:45:47 Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-05-19 14:35:26 Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only