| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive |
| Date: | 2016-03-09 13:47:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaXxVDSOfsCDGtwvZKsL7rvmEVWcw0W_OH94xPqh_hdbw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I have updated the patch to include wait_event_type information in the wait_event table.
I think we should remove "a server process is" from all of these entries.
Also, I think this kind of thing should be tightened up:
+ <entry>A server process is waiting on any one of the commit_timestamp
+ buffer locks to read or write the commit_timestamp page in the
+ pg_commit_ts subdirectory.</entry>
I'd just write: Waiting to read or write a commit timestamp buffer.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-03-09 14:09:46 | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-03-09 13:41:07 | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |