From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |
Date: | 2015-12-22 17:36:42 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaXwFzzvVjJZkrVQoPeJsnOsMREzTkmH0yyPhdDnAo_=w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> On 2015/12/22 15:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> As this debate continues, I think that moving this patch to the next
>>> CF would make the most sense then.. So done this way.
>>
>> Perhaps, this ended (?) with the following commit:
>>
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=385f337c9f39b21dca96ca4770552a10a6d5af24
>
> Ah, thanks! What has been committed is actually more or less
> epq-recheck-v6-efujita.patch posted upthread, I'll mark the patch as
> committed then.
+1. And thanks.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-22 17:37:37 | Re: pglogical_output - a general purpose logical decoding output plugin |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-22 17:34:26 | Re: Possible marginally-incompatible change to array subscripting |