Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Date: 2016-12-19 16:53:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaXXKQe0AZJmAFL5gRWz+oPJmK+WHFfkKqYW7WpVmaUqA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Any particular reason not to change inhOpt to be a simple boolean, and
> remove the enum?

No, no particular reason. I thought about it, but I didn't really see
any advantage in getting rid of the typedef.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-19 17:24:38 Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-12-19 16:48:48 Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance