| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: remaining open items |
| Date: | 2015-10-16 19:14:24 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaUwj98U_2U5tgy=s=KQYZB4xgxH+Gh8WxP1XyutuG52g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all?
>>
>> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile
>> goal, but certainly not a release blocker.
>
> While I agree with this assessment, I think that there is value in
> doing it before release, to ease keeping the branches in sync. That
> seems like the better time to backpatch to 9.5. That was the thinking
> behind putting it on the open items list.
That makes sense, but I think it's time to remove anything that
doesn't smell like an actual release blocker. I'll go do that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-16 19:17:24 | Re: remaining open items |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-16 19:12:07 | Re: proposal: DROP DATABASE variant that kills active sessions |