| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Date: | 2020-04-17 19:16:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaTwhEH88qM8XQ3tSS23+XH7MjYaQj99sQqLGnERexzeg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:38 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Glad you like 'em ;-). Do you have an opinion about what to do
> with the operator tables --- ie do we need a column with the operator
> name at the left?
Well, if the first row says date + date -> date, then I don't think we
also need another column to say that we're talking about +
Seems redundant.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-04-17 19:26:46 | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-04-17 19:11:52 | Split interval (used by nbtree suffix truncation) and posting list tuples |