Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists(at)toco-domains(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
Date: 2016-03-10 14:44:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaT3iBBBNFVgaw=zOsaUgSrtidDNW1kzO7q9+_bJQJMvQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I'm pretty meh about the whole idea of this function, though,
>>> actually, and I don't see a single clear +1 vote for this
>>> functionality upthread. (Apologies if I've missed one.) In the
>>> absence of a few of those, I recommend we reject this.
>>
>> +1
>
> I'm meh for this patch.

+1: David Steele, Vik Fearing, David Johnson, Alvaro Herrera
meh: Robert Haas, Michael Paquier
-1: Simon Riggs

That's probably marginally enough support to proceed with this, but
I'm somewhat unenthused about putting time into it myself. Alvaro,
any chance you want to handle this one?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stas Kelvich 2016-03-10 14:50:23 2PC support for pglogical
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-10 14:43:57 Re: Floating point timestamps