| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(dot)hagander(at)redpill-linpro(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
| Date: | 2024-03-25 18:45:40 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaSsAeXq5PUsTViHT=sWdXDBm6o2AkG0GDiC1NW-k9yRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 2:26 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wonder whether this feature should include teaching the server
> to ignore postgresql.auto.conf altogether, which would make it
> relatively easy to get to a bulletproof configuration.
This has been debated a few times on the thread already, but a number
of problems with that idea have been raised, and as far as I can see,
everyone who suggested went on to recant and agree that we shouldn't
do that. If you feel a strong need to relitigate that, please check
the prior discussion first.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-03-25 18:48:24 | Re: pgsql: Clean up role created in new subscription test. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-03-25 18:44:00 | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection |