Re: Bypassing cursors in postgres_fdw to enable parallel plans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: KENAN YILMAZ <kenan(dot)yilmaz(at)localus(dot)com(dot)tr>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bypassing cursors in postgres_fdw to enable parallel plans
Date: 2026-07-02 17:57:36
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaSC6p4JfvoWCX5BXPotoi4g63+zqLmQ5QuGxyLOjBfCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 5:27 AM Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So, do you suggest we can have a backpointer of conn also in active_fsstate...?

I think that fsstate and active_fsstate have to be pointing to the
same conn_state object. Do you think otherwise?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2026-07-02 17:57:38 Re: Improve pg_stat_statements scalability
Previous Message Robert Haas 2026-07-02 17:54:00 Re: satisfies_hash_partition crash