| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Date: | 2015-09-23 16:00:15 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaRzBq0-SwvmpXB8Kq_Q_aAJCF9Ng+YF7Bd_OeXtgtoKg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Instead of passing the Plan down by casting, how about passing
>> &local_node->plan? And similarly for scans and joins.
> Changed as per suggestion.
The point of this change was to make it so that we wouldn't need the
casts any more. You changed it so we didn't, but then didn't actually
get rid of them. I did that, tweaked a comment, and committed this.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-09-23 16:01:55 | Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-09-23 15:53:50 | Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING |