| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add -c to rsync commands on SR tutorial wiki page |
| Date: | 2016-08-22 20:55:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaNz+ui-BqTXE6THs=qFjsLdErw1fZK8vcu1hNvhzt=RQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't think it's any great leap for someone to think they can use those
> commands incrementally. It's certainly one of the first things you think of
> when using rsync. AFAIK there's no downside at all to using -c when it is a
> brand new copy, so I'm thinking we should just put it in there, especially
> considering what the potential downside is.
I think that's right.
The suggestion that people might use some backup tool is a good one,
but that's not a reason not to add -c here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-08-22 21:00:45 | Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-08-22 20:50:11 | Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) |