Re: patch: prevent user from setting wal_buffers over 2GB bytes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Takashi Horikawa <t-horikawa(at)aj(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch: prevent user from setting wal_buffers over 2GB bytes
Date: 2015-08-04 17:13:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaNirZqy3GrWM_5o+k+g+M7=ZGiiaR=UNPDcWWaPS6kGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> So my vote is for the original approach. (I've not read Josh's patch,
>> so there might be something wrong with it in detail, but I like the
>> basic approach.)
>
> +1

OK, committed and back-patched that all the way back to 9.0.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-08-04 17:15:52 Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-08-04 16:30:08 Re: Tab completion for CREATE SEQUENCE