Re: Parallel Append implementation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Append implementation
Date: 2017-02-14 17:05:58
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaMrEWWCT9ndsgGKRd8PN_RNYLgznJ_qBiTh0TrNpJAPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Having the extra
> 1-2 workers exist does not seem better.

Err, exit, not exist.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-02-14 17:06:48 Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-02-14 17:05:36 Re: Parallel Append implementation