Re: nested loop semijoin estimates

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: nested loop semijoin estimates
Date: 2015-06-05 12:21:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaJPQnte04tLV2zo5D6CTnL4Bu6pQiQ4UKtjmrhdrZb7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> What it seems like we should do, if we want to back-patch this, is apply
> it without the add_path_precheck changes. Then as an independent
> HEAD-only patch, change add_path_precheck so that it's behaving as
> designed. It looks to me like that will save some planning time in any
> case --- changing add_path_precheck to disregard startup cost when
> appropriate seems to let it reject a lot more paths than it used to.

I'd just like to mention that I really appreciate the time and thought
that went into keeping the back-patched portion of this fix narrow.

Thanks!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-06-05 12:32:55 Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Previous Message Naoya Anzai 2015-06-05 12:10:44 Re: [Proposal] More Vacuum Statistics