Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()?
Date: 2018-12-19 23:04:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaJ67VCefuhkd0fdJiWb64bqBtkbZazbVm6a0wimY0fRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:37 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> What's gained by the logic of emitting that warning in VACUUM after a
> crash? I don't really see any robustness advantages in it. If the logic
> were that we'd never reuse empty pages because they can hide corruption
> that normally would discovered by checksums, then we shouldn't
> reinitialize them at all and instead error out hard - but we can't do
> that, because it's normal that they occur. Right now we have empty
> pages on-disk whenever a busy server is restarted in immediate mode,
> after all.

I don't know. I am just normally reluctant to change things
precipitously that are of long tenure.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-12-19 23:14:37 Re: slow queries over information schema.tables
Previous Message Chengchao Yu 2018-12-19 22:51:17 RE: [PATCH] Fix Proposal - Deadlock Issue in Single User Mode When IO Failure Occurs