Re: superusers are members of all roles?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date: 2011-11-03 01:41:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaJ5-FqM_ATH7EC-L-bRWmRj5_H7YPQZZjpEcd84Zj2TQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Patch with a small docs addition also. Adding to Nov commitfest.

I have reviewed this and it looks good to me. Marking Ready for Committer.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-03 03:16:09 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-03 00:54:03 Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped