Re: Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?
Date: 2017-02-26 17:41:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaJ=RMWNJbt5u1e2fgcV_A=K=PKQMc7nedS-DNK5kOVgA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Having said that, I'm not sure it's worth the trouble of changing.
> The platforms where there's a difference are probably not muscular
> enough that anyone would ever get past 16TB in a temp file anyhow.

Is this comment a reflection of your generally-low opinion about
Windows, or some specific limitation that I don't know about?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-26 17:45:05 Re: Instability in select_parallel regression test
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-02-26 17:39:22 Re: error detail when partition not found