Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Date: 2017-03-07 22:08:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaGmKcr8y=spf7op682t3aM_ptA-3SDG9r8b8MSPfzT7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yeah, actually those were added later in Enable-WAL-for-Hash* patch,
>> but I think as this patch is standalone, so we should not remove it
>> from their existing usage, I have added those back and rebased the
>> remaining patches.
>
> Great, thanks. 0001 looks good to me now, so committed.

Committed 0002.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Ridge 2017-03-07 22:10:41 Example Custom Scan Provider Implementation?
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2017-03-07 21:58:53 Re: Hash support for grouping sets