Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

Kevin has not posted to this mailing list since May 3rd. I don't know
whether he's gone on vacation or been without email access for some
other reason, but I think we'd better assume that he's not likely to
respond to emails demanding immediate action regardless of how many of
them we send.

I'm not prepared to write a patch for this issue, but it seems like
Thomas is on top of that. If nobody else steps up to the plate I
guess I'm willing to take responsibility for reviewing and committing
that patch once it's in final form, but at this point I don't think
it's going to be possible to get that done before Monday's planned
wrap.

In formal terms, if Kevin forfeits ownership of this item and nobody
else volunteers to adopt it, put me down as owner with a next-update
date of Friday, May 19th, the day after beta1 is expected to ship.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company