Re: Regarding GIN Fast Update Technique

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding GIN Fast Update Technique
Date: 2013-06-07 14:15:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaEYSWyVTepY9ks-E09BwTZEUyVMTuOU7A9K9Qu0FW6JA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> At what point do the entries in the pending list are moved to the main
> GIN data structure?
> From documentation, I read that overflowing work_mem and vacuum are
> two such causes; what about when the concerned backend is to exit and
> autovacuum has not yet kicked in?

I don't think there's any special handling for that case, nor do I
think any is needed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2013-06-07 14:28:56 Re: Regarding GIN Fast Update Technique
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-06-07 14:14:29 Re: Cost limited statements RFC