| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning |
| Date: | 2016-03-09 14:20:18 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaECzhafZ8-yGeis=4ubq8aMWL2cbaD0eOp6G_2LpEN9w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I think setting up N ResultRelInfos in advance where the tuple would only
> ever require one might be superfluous. But that may point to some flaw in
> my original design or thinking about the case.
You have a point. But maybe we should get it working first and
optimize it later.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2016-03-09 14:21:11 | Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-09 14:19:20 | Re: Declarative partitioning |