| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |
| Date: | 2017-03-22 16:39:13 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaDoqt-mn+oybf4_o-aOMSJjeG7v4=pX5GnX5dUSomivA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> While I understand that you'd like to separate the concerns between
> changing the renaming scheme and changing the default and enabling this
> option, I don't agree that they can or should be independently
> considered.
Well, I don't understand what you think is going to happen here. Neither
Beena nor any other contributor you don't employ is obliged to write a
patch for those changes because you'd like them to get made, and Peter and
I have already voted against including them. If you or David want to write
a patch for those changes, post it for discussion, and try to get consensus
to commit it, that's of course your right. But the patch will be more than
three weeks after the feature freeze deadline and will have two committer
votes against it from the outset.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-03-22 16:42:31 | Re: Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitrary vacuum flags |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-03-22 16:26:00 | Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |