Re: psql document fix about showing FDW options

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers >> PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql document fix about showing FDW options
Date: 2011-08-12 03:01:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaAyYO67xYKFy_c6ExP8_TqCC0tbPd06_rtUXAdYhKHGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/8/11 Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Yeah, I have (hopefully) working FDW for PostgreSQL which is based on
> the one which has been proposed for 9.1, and updates done by Heikki.
> I've implemented:
>
>  * SELECT clause omitting
>  * WHERE clause pushdown (assuming remote has same functions/oprators)
>  * private connection caching, and VIEW which shows active connections
>  * switch simple SELECT and CURSOR based on estimated # of rows,
>    and FDW options to control this behavior
>
> I'd like to submit this fdw in CF 2011-09 (ASAP) for discussion of
> itself and FDW API enhancement.  Please see the wiki page below for details.

Great stuff. Look forward to seeing the patch(es).

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-08-12 03:22:16 Re: index-only scans
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-08-12 02:59:55 Re: error: could not find pg_class tuple for index 2662