Re: [HACKERS] [bug-fix] Cannot select big bytea values (~600MB)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Anna Akenteva <a(dot)akenteva(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [bug-fix] Cannot select big bytea values (~600MB)
Date: 2018-02-27 18:47:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaAsQyARGvR3s-zG=f2pQy8z1PmODG26MoihGQtCh7Zgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Anna Akenteva
<a(dot)akenteva(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> It's not necessarily my goal. My goal is to avoid the confusing situation
> where you insert something into a table and suddenly everything seems to
> break for no reason and you don't get any information on what to do next. As
> I see it, it could be solved with:
> a) allowing including big bytea values but making sure that it doesn't cause
> problems (which I tried to do with my patch)
> b) prohibiting inserting the kind of data that will cause problems
> c) informing the user about the issue (maybe documenting this behaviour or
> giving a more informative error message)

+1. We don't have to support everything, but things that don't work
should fail on insertion, not retrieval. Otherwise what we have is
less a database and more a data black hole.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-02-27 18:48:44 Re: Proposal for changes in official Docker image
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-02-27 18:43:23 Re: atomics.h may not be included from frontend code