Re: possible deadlock: different lock ordering for heap pages

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Nishant, Fnu" <nishantf(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: possible deadlock: different lock ordering for heap pages
Date: 2019-01-31 19:00:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaArWL7=QRhukXXK2zGCaxLkvYUMxu723=afJp9pDcg+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 9:55 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert, can you please once see if we are missing anything here
> because to me the report and fix look genuine.

I think so, too. I guess the probability of a deadlock here must be *very* low.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-01-31 19:20:33 Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-01-31 18:46:33 Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and UPDATE