Re: FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY
Date: 2015-11-04 19:35:02
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaAkoKRBkre1eT=nQn_vAstfB_iqq8Y7TQ2gTVtaZOjcQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY doesn't behave as I would expect.
>>
>> rhaas=# create policy hideit on foo1 using (a < 3);
>> CREATE POLICY
>> rhaas=# explain select * from foo1;
>> QUERY PLAN
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> Seq Scan on foo1 (cost=0.00..22.70 rows=1270 width=36)
>> (1 row)
>> rhaas=# alter table foo force row level security;
>> ALTER TABLE
>> rhaas=# alter table foo1 enable row level security;
>> ALTER TABLE
>
> Sorry if my prior wasn't clear, but above you do 'foo' and 'foo1'
> independently.
>
> Did you intend to alter table 'foo'?

Hmm. I've clearly done both, but it still doesn't work:

rhaas=# alter table foo1 enable row level security;
ALTER TABLE
rhaas=# alter table foo1 force row level security;
ALTER TABLE
rhaas=# \d foo1
Table "public.foo1"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------
a | integer | not null
b | text |
Policies (Forced Row Security Enabled):
POLICY "hideit" FOR ALL
USING ((a < 3))
Inherits: foo

rhaas=# explain select * from foo1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on foo1 (cost=0.00..22.70 rows=1270 width=36)
(1 row)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2015-11-04 19:35:06 Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-11-04 18:48:28 Re: FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY