| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
| Date: | 2015-10-20 14:50:39 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa8zpPLuXc2-Ee6WOEZk1TQyi+YXhao=tAhooMJ=0BM+w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> I fail to see how doing
>
> HINT: NULL
>
> is much better than just not raising a HINT at all...
I'm not a huge fan of this patch, as previously noted, but I certainly
agree that if we're going to do it, we should ignore a null argument,
not print out the word "NULL". Who would ever want that behavior?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-10-20 14:51:38 | Re: Multi-column distinctness. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-20 14:46:53 | Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes |