| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fix worker_spi to run as non-dynamic background worker |
| Date: | 2014-05-30 03:35:49 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa8bJk25ZiNjqjHpOn9-8h2ON=n0RtD1wC=TSwQ+m9iSw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The feature itself is already mentioned in the release notes in a very
> general manner, by telling that bgworkers can be dynamically
> "registered" and "started". Users can still refer to the documentation
> to see more precisely what kind of infrastructure is in place in 9.4.
>
> So... As I'm on it... What about something like the attached patch?
Hearing no comment from Bruce, committed. Bruce, feel free to modify
or revert if you don't think this is appropriate.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-05-30 03:39:46 | Re: Spreading full-page writes |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-05-30 03:15:05 | Re: recovery testing for beta |