Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
Date: 2018-01-23 14:35:23
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa8WQH_Mw=YntSM_G+i1A9zB65JbUpWcWzVL0zATEnVUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> * Pavel Stehule (pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> here is a GUC based patch for plancache controlling. Looks so this code is
>> working.
>
> This really could use a new thread, imv. This thread is a year old and
> about a completely different feature than what you've implemented here.

+ if (plancache_mode & PLANCACHE_FORCE_GENERIC_PLAN)
+ return false;
+ if (plancache_mode & PLANCACHE_FORCE_CUSTOM_PLAN)
+ return true;

This should be ==, not &.

I could explain why & happens to work, but I won't.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marco Nenciarini 2018-01-23 14:38:45 Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE
Previous Message David Steele 2018-01-23 14:33:47 Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask