| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: savepoint commit performance |
| Date: | 2011-09-06 02:32:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa8DGNupF2urdYRF06WQ-0mfygO+TCB_JySp4_KoB7JwA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> wrote:
> This patch:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
>
> Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten
> about...
>
> Has it already been commit?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-07/msg00206.php
>
> Oh, wait, nevermind, it was revoked and reworked:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg01041.php
>
> but that was posted Jul 19, 2011. And the Patch linked from commitfest is
> Jun 6, 2011. So is that an old patch? Or a new patch?
>
> I'm confused.
As far as I can see, Simon stated that he would revert it but never did so.
Perhaps we should go do that...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-06 02:35:03 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-06 02:30:18 | Re: toast tables on system catalogs |