Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Date: 2019-03-11 19:28:56
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa5WEYWM98OjY8LC=p8O+S+ERvcv6PVmgQA7O4ScRRRPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:26 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Oh. That's easily removed. Though I have to say that other people said
> that they liked it so much that they would have liked to have it in the
> original VACUUM one too (5ba2b281-9c84-772a-cf37-17780d782936(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp).

Huh. Well, that's another option, but then what do we do if the
number of phases is not a constant?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-03-11 19:30:22 Re: pgsql: Removed unused variable, openLogOff.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-03-11 19:26:37 Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]