Re: EXPLAIN VERBOSE with parallel Aggregate

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN VERBOSE with parallel Aggregate
Date: 2016-04-27 03:12:18
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa51CFZEM=vdaJiW2_Zq20FRRSGoCtj+XurNBe3oSNG6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:57 PM, David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 27 April 2016 at 14:30, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:14 PM, David Rowley
>>> <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I'd also have expected the output of both partial nodes to be the
>>>> same, i.e. both prefixed with PARTIAL. Is it intended that they don't?
>>>> or have I made some other mistake?
>>>
>>> No, that's a defect in the patch. I didn't consider that we need to
>>> support nodes with finalizeAggs = false and combineStates = true,
>>> which is why that ERROR was there. Working on a fix now.
>>
>> I think this version should work, provided you use
>> partial_grouping_target where needed.
>
> +static void get_special_variable(Node *node, deparse_context *context,
> + void *private);
>
> "private" is reserved in C++? I understood we want our C code to
> compile as C++ too, right? or did I get my wires crossed somewhere?

I can call it something other than "private", if you have a
suggestion; normally I would have used "context", but that's already
taken in this case. private_context would work, I guess.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-04-27 03:16:01 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Previous Message Joe Conway 2016-04-27 03:08:28 Re: Removing faulty hyperLogLog merge function