| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum worker doesn't immediately exit on postmaster death |
| Date: | 2021-03-22 20:07:12 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa4kqxF4S1LtdY-0FLdHZgXeQGUZ2cbLpNdfZO5K7TACg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:48 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Thanks for that. Attached is just a rebased version with a commit
> message added. If there aren't any other concerns, I'll commit this in
> the next few days and back-patch it. When it comes to 12 and older,
> does anyone want to opine about the wait event to use? I was thinking
> PG_WAIT_TIMEOUT or WAIT_EVENT_PG_SLEEP ...
I'm not sure if we should back-patch this, but I think if you do you
should just add a wait event, rather than using a generic one.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2021-03-22 20:16:28 | Re: postgres_fdw: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA ... LIMIT TO (partition) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-03-22 19:47:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |