Re: WAL consistency check facility

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date: 2017-02-14 17:43:58
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa4hR=jVZvF2nLdN4oA-QQZD0CgnNRbcpBJongWLpyFPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Please find attached a patch with those fixes.

Committed, but I changed the copyright dates to 2016-2017 rather than
just 2017 since surely some of the code was originally written before
2017. Even that might not really be going back far enough, but it
doesn't matter too much.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-14 17:44:59 Re: Set of fixes for WAL consistency check facility
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-02-14 17:38:55 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take