From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unnecessary pointer-NULL checks in pgp-pgsql.c |
Date: | 2015-02-04 13:52:48 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa4a2R1O1CWZ--1mLK2VdL1+2r-7SCikXTwDwR6gy9VUw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> src, dst and ctx are created respectively from mbuf_create_from_data,
>>> mbuf_create and pgp_init which never return NULL and they are palloc'd
>>> all the time. I think that we could simplify things with the patch
>>> attached, note that I added an assertion for correctness but I don't
>>> really think that it is much necessary.
>>
>> Yeah, I'd drop the assertion. Also, how about changing things around
>> slightly so that we lose the goto-label construct? There's only one
>> goto, and its only about 6 lines before the label, so we could just
>> flip the sense of the if-test and put the code that gets skipped
>> inside the if-block.
> Good idea. This gives the patch attached then.
Committed.
(BTW, why do you not leave a blank line between quoted text and your responses?)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-02-04 14:04:23 | Re: pg_dump's aborted transactions |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-02-04 13:44:10 | Re: Getting rid of wal_level=archive and default to hot_standby + wal_senders |