Re: Bug in to_timestamp().

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in to_timestamp().
Date: 2016-08-18 18:40:46
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa4FVrCikyOVGVF6HqGZ92CrkBodDnm4SCeC-o2OiHWrg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:35 AM, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
> Hmm. I haven't really looked into the code, but with applying both patches it looks precisely imitate Oracle's behaviour. Thanks.

This is good to hear, but for us to consider applying something like
this, somebody would need to look into the code pretty deeply.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-08-18 18:41:16 Re: [Patch] New psql prompt substitution %r (m = master, r = replica)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-08-18 18:39:59 Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read