| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Morten Hustveit <morten(at)eventures(dot)vc>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block |
| Date: | 2013-11-28 21:51:14 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa3qLBgM3UAxskNCqOJge=EPmZ2T0jee4ZCPHzHZLRjXw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Seems broadly reasonable, but I'd use "no other effect" throughout.
>
> That sounds awkward, e.g.:
>
> Issuing <command>ROLLBACK</> outside of a transaction
> block emits a warning but has no other effect.
>
> I could live with this:
>
> Issuing <command>ROLLBACK</> outside of a transaction
> block has no effect except emitting a warning.
I prefer the first version, but that's obviously a judgement call.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-11-28 22:00:05 | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-11-28 21:48:54 | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql |