From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Gather Merge |
Date: | 2017-03-09 16:12:36 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa2F7rcWH4aAPa7W6trUKjZ2nUZCOxEkztRgrZiXhOmUw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks Robert for committing this.
>
> My colleague Neha Sharma found one regression with the patch. I was about
> to send this mail and noticed that you committed the patch.
Oops. Bad timing.
> postgres=# explain select aid from pgbench_accounts where aid % 25= 0 group
> by aid;
> ERROR: ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist
I think your fix for this looks right, although I would write it this way:
- gm_plan->plan.targetlist = subplan->targetlist;
+ gm_plan->plan.targetlist = build_path_tlist(root, &best_path->path);
The second part of your fix looks wrong. I think you want this:
create_gather_merge_path(root,
grouped_rel,
subpath,
- NULL,
+ partial_grouping_target,
root->group_pathkeys,
NULL,
&total_groups);
That will match the create_gather_path case.
This test case is still failing for me even with those fixes:
rhaas=# select aid+1 from pgbench_accounts group by aid+1;
ERROR: could not find pathkey item to sort
So evidently there is at least one more bug here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-03-09 16:19:14 | Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-03-09 16:07:25 | Re: Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken |