From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery |
Date: | 2021-08-02 14:48:08 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa-=juf1icJxPNEnzX-xiMKck4ug8jXtJaU=BGXkxE9TA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 9:51 AM Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com> wrote:
> BTW, if you now there's this big push for refactoring StartupXLOG() then what
> frustrating^H^H^H^H^H could be done better - at least from end-user point of view -
> is that there is lack of near real time cyclic messages (every 1min?) about current status,
> performance and maybe even ETA (simplistic case; assuming it is linear).
I agree. See https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoaHQrgDFOBwgY16XCoMtXxsrVGFB2jNCvb7-ubuEe1MGg@mail.gmail.com
and subsequent discussion.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-08-02 14:54:15 | Re: EXEC_BACKEND vs bgworkers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-08-02 14:47:06 | Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery |