Re: Hash Indexes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash Indexes
Date: 2016-11-08 15:54:16
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa=oy4y_3w33Gn8W=3O6CPiuXp6sQgwkEvFi6dE5B2U+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Both the places _hash_squeezebucket() and _hash_splitbucket can use
>> this optimization irrespective of rest of the patch. I will prepare a
>> separate patch for these and send along with main patch after some
>> testing.
>
> Done as a separate patch skip_dead_tups_hash_index-v1.patch.

Thanks. Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-11-08 16:37:58 Re: Radix tree for character conversion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-11-08 15:48:31 Re: unchecked chdir warning