Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT
Date: 2013-09-11 18:00:41
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa=Yz_PTNE3DFzS04G9kqk55UrRb5WxEMmmpe3vE=q4Mg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com) wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 07:13:16PM -0700, David Johnston wrote:
>> > Your feelings on how far to back-patch?
>>
>> All supported versions. The current behavior is a bug every way I look at it.
>
> Agreed. I noticed a stale backend hanging around after a
> cancel/shutdown and this sounds very likely to be the cause and it'd be
> really great to get it fixed.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2013-09-11 18:08:25 Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-09-11 17:55:21 Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers