Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()
Date: 2022-11-17 13:36:33
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa=EncwXDM4vbLfZGKRAcuXn=DO58LjAnOkn=ka7tu40w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:57 PM Himanshu Upadhyaya
<upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think if pred_xmin is aborted and curr_xmin is in progress we should consider it as a corruption case but vice versa is not true.

Yeah, you're right. I'm being stupid about subtransactions again.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-11-17 13:46:21 Re: locale -a missing on Alpine Linux?
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-11-17 13:31:45 Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)