| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, deniel1495(at)mail(dot)ru, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, tejeswarm(at)hotmail(dot)com, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Wood <hexexpert(at)comcast(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Corruption during WAL replay |
| Date: | 2022-03-25 13:53:57 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa=1a+A_gK4gqBf7ypK9NyY5bo--Wqc7Wp3xm8fjsrUOQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> That'll just reduce the probability of failure, not eliminate it.
I mean, if the expected time to the first failure on even 1 machine
exceeds the time until the heat death of the universe by 10 orders of
magnitude, it's probably good enough.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-25 14:02:04 | Re: Corruption during WAL replay |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-25 13:53:25 | Re: identifying unrecognized node type errors |