Re: Built-in CTYPE provider

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Date: 2024-01-12 18:13:04
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa+nt35TYEJ7y+2Z=u2OPcW2SnXxYFn=xzi8fWR-XJEEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:00 PM Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> wrote:
> ISTM that in general the behavior of old psql vs new server does
> not weight much against choosing optimal catalog changes.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2024-01-12 18:16:42 Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2024-01-12 18:07:30 Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning